Just another Society for Advancement of Management Chapter Sites site
SAM ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
Algorithmic Management: The Tin Man of the Gig Economy
Henry Jackson III
DOI:
Citation: Jackson III, H. (2022). Algorithmic management: The tin man of the gig economy. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 87(3),39-46.
Abstract
Significant attention has been given to the algorithmic management models that provide leadership to the global workforce that drives the gig economy (Aneesh, 2009; Danaher, 2016; Rosenblat & Stark, 2016). As the pitfalls of algocratic management are studied (Jabagi et al., 2019), limited consideration is given to strategies aimed at addressing the observed challenges of algorithm-based management. This article considers the findings of empirical studies that examine governance by data (Jabagi et al., 2019; Johns, 2021), while proposing a hybrid model of human-algorithmic management, where human intervention is introduced at key points in the algorithm to address algorithmic management’s growing deficiencies. Just as Baum’s (2018) Tin Man in The Wonderful Wizard of Oz was aware that not having a heart created significant limitations, so too must organizations that profit from algorithmic management. If the organizations behind on-demand labor platforms continue to alienate gig-workers, turning a deaf ear to their frustrations, the tension is bound to erupt into policies or protests that disrupt a global business model which has the potential to improve the global quality of life.
References
Aneesh, A. (2009). Global labor: Algocratic modes of organization. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01352.x
Baum, L. F. (2018). The wonderful wizard of Oz. Minneapolis: Lerner Publishing Group.
Beerepoot, N., & Lambregts, B. (2014). Competition in online job marketplaces: Towards a global labour market for outsourcing services? Global Networks, 15(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12051
Berger, T., Frey, C. B., Levin, G., & Danda, S. R. (2019). Uber happy? Work and well-being in the “gig economy.” Economic Policy, 34(99). https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiz007
Brown, T. (2009). The gig economy. Retrieved from The Daily Beast website: https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-gig-economy
Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018). Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Science, 64(12), 5497–5520. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2916
Citron, D., & Pasquale, F. (2014). The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Review, 89, 1–33.
Codagnone, C., Abadie, F., & Biagi, F. (2016). The future of work in the “sharing economy.” Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2791/431485
Cook, C., Diamond, R., Hall, J. V., List, J. A., & Oyer, P. (2021). The gender earnings gap in the gig economy: Evidence from over a million rideshare drivers. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(5), 2210–2238. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa081
Danaher, J. (2016). The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & Technology, 29(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1
Danaher, J., Hogan, M. J., Noone, C., Kennedy, R., Behan, A., De Paor, A., … Shankar, K. (2017). Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554
Emilio, R., Zamponi, L., & Caciagli, C. (2019). Labour activism and social movement unionism in the gig economy. food delivery workers struggles in italy. Partecipazione E Conflitto, 12(3). Retrieved from http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/21279
Hyperwallet. (2017). The future of gig work is female. Retrieved from Hyperwallet website: http://www.hyperwallet.com
Irani, L. (2015). Difference and dependence among digital workers: The case of amazon mechanical turk. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831665
Jabagi, N., Croteau, A.-M., Audebrand, L. K., & Marsan, J. (2019). Gig-workers’ motivation: Thinking beyond carrots and sticks. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-06-2018-0255
Johns, F. (2021). Governance by data. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120920-085138
Larsson, A., & Teigland, R. (2020). The digital transformation of labor: Automation, the gig economy and welfare. New York: Routledge.
Leavitt, H. J., & Whisler, T. L. (1958). Management in the 1980’s. Harvard Business Review, 36(6), 41.
Rani, U., & Furrer, M. (2020). Digital labour platforms and new forms of flexible work in developing countries: Algorithmic management of work and workers. Competition & Change, 25(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420905187
Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784.
Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The “gig economy”: Employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation?. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2019). Digital economy report 2019: Value creation and capture – Implications for developing countries. Retrieved from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development website: https://unctad.org/webflyer/digital-economy-report-2019
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Zarsky, T. (2016). The trouble with algorithmic decisions: An analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915605575